(PS) Miller v. Sacramento City Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20212:21-cv-00757California508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SONIA MAREE MILLER, No. 2:21-cv-0757-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED (ECF Nos. 14, 15) SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On August 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed an order and findings and recommendations denying plaintiff’s request for e-filing privileges and recommending that plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be denied. (ECF No. 14.) On August 24, 2021, plaintiff filed objections to both the order and the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 15), which have been considered by the court. In reviewing findings and recommendations on a dispositive motion, this court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.