(HC) Garrett v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20212:21-cv-01270California1,722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAMEO LOREE GARRETT, No. 2:21-cv-1270 TLN AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, seeks habeas relief and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 33 (habeas petitions and in forma pauperis applications). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In addition to filing three in forma pauperis applications and two amended petitions, petitioner has filed a number of other motions, including but not limited to an emergency motion for release, a “request for writ of review,” a request for recusal of judges, a request for removal, a request for transfer, requests for addresses of different courts, and requests for other miscellaneous relief. See ECF Nos. 14, 16, 28, 19-24,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.