(PS) Narayan v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20212:19-cv-00466California3,148 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:19-cv-0466-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 125) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Before the court is a motion by the remaining defendants to modify the scheduling order to allow their filing of a dispositive summary judgment motion beyond the deadline set for dispositive motions. (ECF No. 125.) The motion was originally set for hearing on October 13, 2021, but after receiving plaintiff’s notice of “protest” that he objected to the hearing and would not participate, the court took the motion under submission. (ECF Nos. 136, 137.) In deciding the motion, the court has considered the papers filed in support, plaintiff’s opposition, defendants’ reply,1 and plaintiff’s surreply. (ECF Nos. 125, 126, 132, 134.)

1 Defendants’ reply filed on September 24, 2021 was timely, contrary to plaintiff’s argument, because the hearing was set for October 13, 2021—making the reply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.