Razo

Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20211:20-cv-00172California5,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS M. SALAS RAZO, on his own Case No. 1:20-cv-00172-NONE-HBK behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, APPOINT INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL1 v. (Doc. No. 24) AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, SEVEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendant. 17 INTRODUCTION Pending is Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Interim Class Counsel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g). (Doc. No. 24, “Motion”). Plaintiff seeks the appointment of his counsel, Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, as interim class counsel in this action in order to protect the rights of the putative class members. (See generally Id.). Plaintiff charges a competing action, Wallack et. al v. AT&T Mobility, Case No. CIVSB2117915, San Bernardino Superior Court (“Wallack”), is a reverse auction aimed at “gutting this case” thus necessitating the appointment of interim Class counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.