Arnette

(PC) Jones v. Arnette

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20211:16-cv-01212California2,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

vs. (ECF No. 97.)

ARNETTE, et al., ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

Defendants. PRODUCTION #

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s ADA claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, Gonzalez, Flores, Arnett,1 Zamora, and Lopez; Plaintiff’s Equal Protection claims against defendants Lopez and Zamora; Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment Claims

28 1 Sued as Arnette. against defendants Vasquez, Keener And Gonzalez; and, Plaintiff’s Due Process Claims Against defendants Vasquez, Keener,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.