(PC) Garvin v. Mule Creek State Prison
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH GARVIN, No. 2:19-cv-2024 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, Defendant. 16 By order filed April 12, 2021, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 6. He then requested and was granted two sixty-day extensions of time. ECF Nos. 12, 15. In granting the second motion for an extension, the court warned plaintiff that no further extensions would be granted, and that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 15. The time for filing an amended complaint has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY…