Emerson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JERRY DILLINGHAM, CASE NO. 1:18-cv-00507-AWI-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

OF THE COURT’S SEPTEMBER 23,

N. EMERSON, et al., 2021 ORDER

Defendants. (Doc. No. 119) 11 12 Plaintiff Jerry Dillingham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s “objections” to the Court’s September 23, 2021 order. Doc. No. 119. The Court will construe Plaintiff’s objections, which were filed on October 13, 2021, as a motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Rule 60(b) provides courts with discretionary authority to relieve a party from an order on grounds of “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence . . . ; (3) fraud . . . , misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5)…