Radasa

(PC) Choyce v. Radasa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20212:20-cv-00608California4,923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALVIN CHOYCE, No. 2:20-cv-0608 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

N. RADASA, Defendant. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis. Defendant Radasa’s motion for summary judgment is before the court. As discussed below, the motion should be granted. II. Plaintiff’s Allegations In his verified complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendant Radasa on several occasions intentionally denied plaintiff his PRN medication for his chronic chest pains and high blood pressure, causing plaintiff’s condition to worsen, subjecting him to a possible stroke or heart attack, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that on July 5, 2019, defendant reported to C-facility clinic to access medical treatment for chest pains, and obtain water for his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.