Kunz

Kunz v. Aoki

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20212:21-cv-01502California2,584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELANIE J. KUNZ; MEDEDCO, LCC; No. 2:21-cv-01502-TLN-CKD

CHUI FAISING; TIMOTHY TIGHT;

MICHAEL MCCARTHY; GLENN WILSON; JOHN MULLEN; and RICHARD GIRARD, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. THOMAS T. AOKI; AOKI DIABETES

RESEARCH INSTITUTE; JOANNA R.

MENDOZA; SCOTT MICHAEL

PLAMONDON; DUYEN NGUYEN;

FRANK F. SOMMERS; and SOMMERS & SCHWARTZ, LLP, 19 Defendants. 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Melanie J. Kunz, MedEdCo, LLC, Chui Faising, Timothy Tight, Michael McCarthy (“McCarthy”), Glenn Wilson, John Mullen, and Richard Girard’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 11.) Defendants Thomas T. Aoki (“Aoki”), Aoki Diabetes Research Institute (“ADRI”), Joanna R. Mendoza, Scott Michael Plamondon, Duyen Nguyen, Frank F. Sommers, and Sommers & Schwartz, LLP’s (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 22.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.