(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20212:19-cv-01663California1,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2: 19-cv-1663 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner, proceeding with this civil action. Pending before the court is defendant Shelton’s motion to reopen discovery. (ECF No. 77.) Also pending is plaintiff’s motion to reopen discovery as to defendant Shelton. (ECF No. 79.) For the reasons stated herein, defendant Shelton’s motion to reopen discovery is granted, and plaintiff’s motion to reopen discovery is denied Background On August 5, 2020, Magistrate Judge Delaney issued a discovery and scheduling order setting the discovery cut-off date for November 30, 2020. (ECF No. 27.) The scheduling order stated that all discovery requests pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 31, 33, 34 or 36 were to be served no later than sixty days prior to November 30, 2020, i.e., October 1, 2020. (Id.)

On October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.