(PC) Driver v. Kern County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20212:20-cv-01665California2,140 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BILLY DRIVER, JR., No. 2:20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 15, 2021, the magistrate judge recommended that defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be denied on the grounds that plaintiff met the imminent danger exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 63.) Plaintiff did not file objections. The undersigned herein addresses defendants’ objections to the July 15, 2021 findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 69.) This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint filed September 28, 2020 against defendants Bansal, Rauf and Maya. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff alleges that defendants violated the 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.