Sanders-Hollis

Sanders-Hollis v. State of CA, Health and Human Services Agency, Dept. of Social Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20212:19-cv-00092California506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] Clarice Sanders-Hollis, No. 2:19-cv-00092-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. State of California, Health and Human Services Agency, Department of Social Services, Defendant. Defendant California Department of Social Services (DSS)! moves to extend the deadlines 18 for discovery, expert discovery, and dispositive motions, all of which have passed. Mot. at 2, ECF No. 41-1. Defendant did not complete discovery while its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint was pending. Defendant’s met and conferred with Plaintiff's counsel. Although plaintiffs counsel refused to stipulate to any extension, Email, Mot. Ex. A, ECF No. 41, counsel did not file any timely opposition to this motion. Rule 6(b) generally permits a court to extend deadlines after they pass for good cause “if 24 the party failed to act because of excusable neglect.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 (b)(1)(B); see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.