Newsome

(PC) Ramirez v. Newsome

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20211:21-cv-01389California850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01389-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN

v. FORMA PAUPERIS GAVIN NEWSOME, et al., (Doc. No. 6) Defendants. ORDER TO SUBMIT COMPLETED

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

18 Plaintiff Israel Maldonado Ramirez initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 16, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). The complaint was not accompanied by the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See docket). On September 21, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff within thirty days to either pay the fee or apply to proceed IFP. (Doc. No. 3). On October 15, 2021, Plaintiff moved to proceed IFP. (Doc. No. 6). The application was deficient because it lacked Plaintiff’s original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.