Bobadilla

(PC) Ardds v. Bobadilla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20211:20-cv-00887California749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. ARRDS, No. 1:20-cv-00887-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S

BOBADILLA, et al., FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES PRIOR TO

Defendants. FILING SUIT (Doc. Nos. 28, 36) 17 Plaintiff Antoine L. Arrds is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 25, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28) be granted due to plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit as is required. (Doc. No. 36.) The findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.