(HC) Solomon v. United States District Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20212:21-cv-00718California685 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 TIMOTHY SOLOMON, Case No. 2:21-cv-00718-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO RULE ON

v. THESE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Respondent. THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

FEDERAL HABEAS CLAIM ECF No. 10 16 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I previously found that his first petition did not state a cognizable claim and offered him leave to amend. ECF No. 7. He has now filed an amended petition that, for the reasons stated below, also does not state a cognizable claim. ECF No. 10. The amended petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the assigned judge must examine the habeas 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.