Arnette
(PC) Jones v. Arnette
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
vs. (ECF No. 112.)
ARNETTE, et al.,
Defendants.
14 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. On October 15, 2021, the court granted Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order, and on October 18, 2021, the court granted in part Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF Nos. 110, 111.) On October 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the court’s orders, which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 112.) II. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Rule 60(b) allows the Court to relieve a party from an order for “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered…