Koresko

Koresko v. Cook

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20211:21-cv-01432California3,969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN J KORESKO, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01432-DAD-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH ) LEAVE TO AMEND v. ) ) [THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE] TURHAN COOK, an individual, et al., ) Defendants. ) ) )

John Koresko seeks to proceed pro se and in forma pauperis1 in this action against Turhan Cook and the Kern County Sheriff’s Department. (See Docs. 1, 3, 4.) Because Plaintiff fails to allege facts sufficient to support the claims, the complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. I. Screening Requirement When an individual seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court is required to review the complaint and shall dismiss a complaint, or portion of the complaint, if it is “frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or . . . seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.