Mayes

(PC) Vaden v. Mayes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20212:19-cv-02216California344 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE VADEN, JR., No. 2:19-cv-2216 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT L. MAYES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 10, 2021, defendants filed a motion asking that plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be revoked. In response to the motion, plaintiff paid the filing fee for this action. Because plaintiff is now free to proceed with this action regardless of his in forma pauperis status, defendants’ motion will be denied as moot. Also, on September 13, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion asking that the court appoint him an investigator and medical expert. The court does not appoint investigators or experts for litigants not proceeding in forma pauperis. Even if plaintiff were still proceeding in forma pauperis, the expenditure of public funds on behalf of an indigent litigant is proper only when authorized by 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.