Henrietta Mine LLC v. A.M. King Industries Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20212:21-cv-00711California2,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRIETTA MINE, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00711-JAM-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL ON THE

A.M. KING INDUSTRIES, INC., PLEADINGS Defendant. 16 This dispute involves an agreement for the sale of mining equipment located at the Endako Mine in British Columbia between A.M. King Industries, Inc. (“King” or “Defendant”) and Henrietta Mine, LLC (“Henrietta” or “Plaintiff”). See generally Compl., ECF No. 1-1. Henrietta agreed to purchase the equipment from King for $500,000. Id. ¶¶ 36, 39-41. After Henrietta paid King, King informed Henrietta that Endako Mine would not allow Henrietta to remove the equipment unless it complied with some additional requirements. Id. ¶ 45. Henrietta declined and demanded King return the $500,000 for failing to deliver the equipment as agreed. Id. ¶ 48. King refused, and this lawsuit for breach of contract and unjust enrichment followed. King now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.