Hasem

(PC) Ray v. Hasem

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20212:21-cv-00072California314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. RAY, No. 2:21-cv-0072 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

O. HASEM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 3, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed non-prisoner in forma pauperis application and to do so within thirty days. ECF No. 12. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required document. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this matter, and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.