Acob

(PC) Ellis v. Acob

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 22, 20212:21-cv-01632California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN ELLIS, No. 2:21-cv-1632 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. ACOB, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed an in forma pauperis application in which he states that he has no cash. ECF No. 5 at 2. However, his attached inmate trust account statement reflects that he has a balance of $5,417.99. Id. at 4. The court may authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security therefor” by an individual who submits an application evidencing an inability to pay such fees or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff has made an inadequate showing of indigency in the application before the court. It will therefore be recommended that the application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that plaintiff be required to pay the $402.00 before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.