Burnes

(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20211:21-cv-00712California583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDIE ANTHONY JARAMILLO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00712-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST

J. BURNES, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Rudie Anthony Jaramillo alleges the defendants subjected him to excessive force and retaliation and failed to protect him from an attack by another inmate. (Doc. 1.) The subject incidents occurred on April 25, May 16, and May 29, 2019. (Id. at 5, 7, 8.) For each of these incidents, Plaintiff admits that he has not yet exhausted his administrative remedies.1 (Id.) The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under . . . any other Federal law . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 24 1 With respect to one of the incidents, Plaintiff states that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.