Ento

Ento v. Washington, DC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20211:21-cv-01537California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CHRISTIAN DAVID ENTO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01537-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

WASHINGTON, DC, et al., (Doc. No. 2)

Defendants. ORDER TO SUBMIT COMPLETED

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

18 19 Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a pro se Civil Rights Complaint By a Prisoner form1 om action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 18, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Concurrent with the complaint, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. No. 2). The application to proceed in forma pauperis is deficient because it was not completed but was left blank and was unsigned. (Id.). Each motion or pleading filed with this Court must include the original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.