Sodergren

(PS) Ciurar v. Sodergren

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20212:20-cv-02089California2,663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAGDALINA C. CIURAR, No. 2:20-cv-2089 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Magdalina C. Ciurar is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s amended complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 2 & 4.) Therein, plaintiff seeks reinstatement of a State of California issued pharmacy technician license and monetary damages. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). I. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application makes the financial showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.