(PC) Chaidez v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20211:21-cv-01189California1,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRECILIANO TOMAS CHAIDEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01189-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

et al., FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (ECF No. 3)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 19 I. Background Plaintiff Preciliano Tomas Chaidez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 9, 2021, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 3.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.