Mez

(PS) Martin v. Mez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20212:20-cv-00855California1,901 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN M. MARTIN, Case No. 2:20-cv-00855-JAM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT:

v. 1) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION BE RYAN MEZ, et al., GRANTED IN PART Defendants. ECF No. 38 2) PLAINTIFF’S VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF RYAN MEZ BE

VACATED ECF No. 28 3) PLAINTIFF BE DIRECTED TO FILE

AN AMENDED MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHIN

DAYS

21 ECF No. 23

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS

23 24 Plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, voluntarily dismissed a defendant in a misguided effort to avoid paying that defendant’s attorney’s fees. He now seeks to correct his error, attributing his mistake to a statement made by counsel for defendants. I believe correction is warranted. 28 On November 13, 2020, the court screened…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.