Jerry Cox v. Mariposa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20211:19-cv-01105California7,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JERRY COX, an Individual, CASE NO. 1:19-CV-01105-AWI-BAM

Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

MARIPOSA COUNTY; MARIPOSA DISMISS BY DEFENDANT ASHLEY

COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; SHERIFF HARRIS

DEPUTY WILLIAM ATKINSON;

SHERIFF DEPUTY WESLEY SMITH; ASHLEY HARRIS; CALIFORNIA (Doc. No. 52) RECEIVERSHIP GROUP (“CRG”); MARK ADAMS IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL

CAPACITY, AND DOES 1 THROUGH

100, INCLUSIVE.

Defendants.

18 Defendant Ashley Harris brings a motion seeking dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil 19 Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) of all five of Plaintiff Jerry Cox’s claims against her in this action, 20 including claims under state law and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 52. The motion has been 21 fully briefed and the Court has deemed it suitable for decision without oral argument, pursuant to 22 Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.