Jerry Cox v. Mariposa County
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20211:19-cv-01105California7,574 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JERRY COX, an Individual, CASE NO. 1:19-CV-01105-AWI-BAM
Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
MARIPOSA COUNTY; MARIPOSA DISMISS BY DEFENDANT ASHLEY
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; SHERIFF HARRIS
DEPUTY WILLIAM ATKINSON;
SHERIFF DEPUTY WESLEY SMITH; ASHLEY HARRIS; CALIFORNIA (Doc. No. 52) RECEIVERSHIP GROUP (“CRG”); MARK ADAMS IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL
CAPACITY, AND DOES 1 THROUGH
100, INCLUSIVE.
Defendants.
18 Defendant Ashley Harris brings a motion seeking dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil 19 Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) of all five of Plaintiff Jerry Cox’s claims against her in this action, 20 including claims under state law and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 52. The motion has been 21 fully briefed and the Court has deemed it suitable for decision without oral argument, pursuant to 22 Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and…