Raygoza

(PC) Ward v. Raygoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20211:21-cv-00903California2,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONALD WILLIAM WARD, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00903-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

C HRISTINE RAYGOZA, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION ) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) ) (ECF No. 13)

Plaintiff Ronald William Ward is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 16 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed October 14, 2021. 18 I.

SCREENING REQUIREMENT

20 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 21 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court 22 must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.