Fry
(PC) Thomas v. Fry
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, No. 2:19-cv-1041 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND J.C. FRY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. In his second amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that his access to products containing high amounts of real sugar, such as sugar itself, syrup, honey, jelly and certain types of candy, is prohibited under California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) regulations. It appears that plaintiff cannot purchase those items in the commissary at his prison or receive such products from outside the prison. Plaintiff also alleges that the wardens of prisons housing females have discretion to permit the sale of products containing high amounts of real sugar in their commissaries and to permit their inmates from obtaining such products from outside the prison. Plaintiff is proceeding, in part, on a claim for damages arising…