G.P.P., Inc. v. Guardian Protection Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20211:15-cv-00321California531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

G.P.P., INC. d/b/a GUARDIAN

INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS,

Case No. 1:15-cv-00321-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. 444)

GUARDIAN PROTECTION PRODUCTS,

INC., RPM WOOD FINISHES GROUP,

INC.,

15 Defendants. _____________________________________/

17 Plaintiff G.P.P., Inc. d/b/a Guardian Innovative Solutions (“GIS”) brings this Motion for Reconsideration asking the Court to reconsider portions of its “Scope of Trial” determination contained in its October 22, 2021 Pretrial Order. (Doc. 444.) The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g). A district court should not grant a motion for reconsideration unless: (1) it is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) it committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) there was an intervening change in controlling law. Carroll v. Nakatani, 342 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.