Barber

(PC) Wilkins v. Barber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20212:19-cv-01338California2,170 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 WBS KJN P

BROWN,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s motions for extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’ motions for summary judgment, and for sanctions are before the court. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for sanctions is denied; plaintiff’s motions for extension of time are granted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions Plaintiff seeks unspecified sanctions for defendants’ violation of this court’s September 11, 2020 order requiring defendants to redact sensitive or confidential information, such as remote social history, that is not relevant to plaintiff’s underlying claims. Plaintiff contends that defendants’ failure to comply with the court’s order, by two separate attorneys of record, was willful and intentional, and therefore both counsel should be sanctioned. Defendants oppose the 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.