Rocha

(PC) Zaiza v. Rocha

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20211:21-cv-01295California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA, No. 1:21-cv-01295-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

ROCHA, et al., ACTION AS DUPLICATIVE Defendants. (Doc. No. 11) 16 Plaintiff Jose Roberto Zaiza is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 13, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint and issued an order for plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as duplicative of Zaiza v. Clark, Case No. 1:19-cv-01476-DAD-GSA (“Zaiza I”). (Doc. No. 8.) Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause on September 27, 2021. (Doc. No. 9.) On September 29, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the instant action be found to be duplicative of Zaiza I and dismissed as duplicative. (Doc. No. 11.) Plaintiff timely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.