Razo
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS M. SALAS RAZO, on his own No. 1:20-cv-00172-NONE-HBK behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT
INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL
AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC, (Doc. Nos. 24, 42, 44) Defendant.
17 Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to appoint interim class counsel under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g) (“Rule 23(g)”). (Doc. No. 24). Plaintiff seeks the appointment of his counsel, Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, as interim class counsel in this action in order to protect the rights of the putative class members. (See generally id.). Plaintiff asserts that a competing action, Wallack et. al v. AT&T Mobility, No. CIVSB2117915 (“Wallack”), filed in San Bernardino Superior Court, is a reverse auction aimed at “gutting this case” thus necessitating the appointment of interim Class counsel to protect the rights of the…