Anglea

(PC) Madrid v. Anglea

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20211:19-cv-01456California1,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO MADRID, No. 1:19-cv-01456-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

H. ANGLEA, (Doc. Nos. 47, 52) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Alejandro Madrid is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 2, 2021, defendant Anglea filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff had failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). (Doc. No. 47.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition within the time provided by Local Rules 230(l), and he did not request an extension of time to file either response. Therefore, the assigned magistrate 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.