James

James v. Drivetime of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20211:20-cv-00207California218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 VANESSA JAMES, Case No. 1: 20-cv-00207-NONE-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND

v. CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET

TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

DRIVETIME OF FRESNO, PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Defendant. (ECF No. 29) 14 On October 27, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice. (ECF 16 No. 29.) The stipulation does not address any award for costs or attorneys’ fees. In light of the 17 stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson 18 v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice 19 and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to assign a district judge to 21 this case for the purpose of closing the case and then to adjust the docket to reflect voluntary 22 |…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.