James
James v. Drivetime of Fresno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 VANESSA JAMES, Case No. 1: 20-cv-00207-NONE-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND
v. CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET
TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
DRIVETIME OF FRESNO, PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Defendant. (ECF No. 29) 14 On October 27, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice. (ECF 16 No. 29.) The stipulation does not address any award for costs or attorneys’ fees. In light of the 17 stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson 18 v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice 19 and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to assign a district judge to 21 this case for the purpose of closing the case and then to adjust the docket to reflect voluntary 22 |…