Hale

Hale v. Manna Pro Products, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20212:18-cv-00209California5,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] Ashley Hale individually, and on behalf of No. 2:18-cv-00209-KJM-DB other members of the general public similarly situated, , Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 Manna Pro Products, LLC, 16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter is before the court on two unopposed motions by plaintiff Ashley Hale. The 20 first seeks an award of attorneys’ fees and costs and payment of an incentive award to Ms. Hale, Mot. Att’ys’ Fees, ECF. No. 67; Mem. Att’ys’ Fees, ECF No. 67-1. The second 1s for final 22 approval of the parties’ class action settlement. Mot. Final Approval, ECF No. 68. As explained 23 below, the court grants both motions. 24 I. BACKGROUND Ms. Hale, a rabbit breeder, bought “Manna Pro Select Series Pro Formula Premium Rabbit Feed” (the feed mix). Second Am. Compl. (SAC) §f 17, 19, ECF No. 23. The bag was 27 labeled with the following: “Contains No Corn: Helps Reduce The Risk of Digestive Disorders.” 28 The list of ingredients on the bag did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.