Gibson

(PC) Maurice Haskell v. Gibson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20211:21-cv-01184California1,952 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE HASKELL, Case No. 1:21-cv-01184-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION GIBSON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Defendants.

FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 17 (ECF No. 8)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

21 Plaintiff Maurice Haskell (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 22 pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s 23 complaint, filed on August 3, 2021, and granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on September 30, 2021, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 8.)

1 Plaintiff initiated this action together with a second Plaintiff on July 15, 2021 (Case No. 21-cv- 1174 BAM). By separate order, the Court directed this action to be severed and a separate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.