Leatherman
(PC) Reed v. Leatherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER J. REED, No. 2:18-cv-0038 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS D. LEATHERMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 On September 23, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a response to defendants’ August 23, 2021 motion for sanctions for violation of a protective order within 21 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a response would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The 21-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a response. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations,…