(HC) Miles v. People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20212:21-cv-01143California452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE MILES, SR., No. 2:21-cv-01143 TLN GGH P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). On August 2, 2021, the undersigned directed petitioner to file, within thirty days from the date of the order, an amended habeas petition and an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or the filing fee in the amount of $5.00. ECF No. 6. Petitioner was warned that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. Id. Petitioner did not comply, nor respond, to the court’s orders within the requisite deadline. On September 28, 2021, the court ordered petitioner to show cause within 14 days, why…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.