Ross

(PS) Ferreira da Silva v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20212:21-cv-01208California2,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRA FERREIRA DA SILVA, No. 2:21-cv-01208-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JONATHAN KEVIN ROSS, et al., AND

ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE

Defendants.

17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint filed on October 1, 2021 (ECF No. 12) and motion to stay off removal procedure (ECF No. 3) are before the court. I. SCREENING AND PLEADING STANDARDS Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (2000). A claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.