Diaz

(PC) Hammler v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20212:20-cv-01890California1,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 2:20-cv-01890-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO EXPEDITE

v. ECF No. 18 R. DIAZ, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants. THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDMENT

RETALIATION CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANTS MATTA, DUNN, AND

NAVARRO PROCEED AND ALL OTHER

CLAIMS BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

18 ECF No. 13

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

20 21 I previously screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and advised him that it contains claims that, because they are unrelated, cannot proceed in a single action. I notified him that he could either file an amended complaint including only related claims or stand by the amended complaint, subject to dismissal of the complaint or parties. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff has elected to stand by the amended complaint. ECF No. 17. Instead of dismissing the amended complaint in its entirety, I recommend that plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.