Diaz
(PC) Hammler v. Diaz
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20212:20-cv-01890California1,219 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 2:20-cv-01890-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO EXPEDITE
v. ECF No. 18 R. DIAZ, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants. THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDMENT
RETALIATION CLAIMS AGAINST
DEFENDANTS MATTA, DUNN, AND
NAVARRO PROCEED AND ALL OTHER
CLAIMS BE DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
18 ECF No. 13
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
20 21 I previously screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and advised him that it contains claims that, because they are unrelated, cannot proceed in a single action. I notified him that he could either file an amended complaint including only related claims or stand by the amended complaint, subject to dismissal of the complaint or parties. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff has elected to stand by the amended complaint. ECF No. 17. Instead of dismissing the amended complaint in its entirety, I recommend that plaintiff…