Krieger

Krieger v. C R Bard Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20211:20-cv-00445California297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BONNIE KRIEGER, No. 1:20-cv-00445-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO DISMISS THIS

C R BARD INCORPORATED, et al., ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

Defendant. PROCEDURE 41(a)(2) (Doc. No. 47)

17 On August 2, 2021, plaintiff filed a request to dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 47.) On August 13, 2021, defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to the pending request. (Doc. No. 49.) A district court should grant a motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) unless a defendant can show that it will suffer some plain legal prejudice as a result. Waller v. Fin. Corp. of Am., 828 F.2d 579, 583 (9th Cir. 1987). Here, defendants do not oppose plaintiff’s request for voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.