Crounse

(PC) Villery v. Crounse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20211:18-cv-01623California8,158 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED M. VILLERY, Case No. 1:18-cv-01623-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION

OF DOCUMENTS FROM DEFENDANT

D. CROUNSE, et al., CROUNSE

Defendants. (Doc. 58) 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Villery’s motion to compel Defendant Crounse to produce documents responsive to Plaintiff’s first and second sets of requests for production of documents. (Doc. 58.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims of retaliation and conspiracy to commit retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 56.) At all times relevant to this action, Plaintiff was incarcerated at California Correctional Institution (“CCI”) in Tehachapi, California. (Doc. 49 at 3.) In his first amended complaint, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.