Khripach

(PC) Rouser v. Khripach

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20212:21-cv-00233California1,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ROUSER, Case No. 2:21-cv-00233-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT

PLAINTIFF’S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

v. DISCRIMINATION CLAIM AGAINST

DEFENDANT KHRIPACH PROCEED AND ALL

J. LYNCH, et al., OTHER CLAIMS BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Defendants. ECF No. 11

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 18 I previously screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and advised him that it contains claims that, because they are unrelated, cannot proceed in a single action. I notified plaintiff that he could either file an amended complaint including only related claims or stand by the amended complaint, subject to dismissal of the complaint or parties. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff has elected to stand by the amended complaint. ECF No. 13. Instead of dismissing the amended complaint in its entirety, I recommend that plaintiff be permitted to proceed on his Fourteenth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.