Lull
Lull v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-1645-KJM-CKD Plaintiffs, ORDER v. County of Sacramento, et al., Defendants. 16 17 This action is the third of four related cases brought by plaintiffs Christopher Lull and Autotek in this court, the first of which is closed: (1) Lull v. County of Sacramento, No. 16-cv-01093 (E.D. Cal filed May 20, 2016 closed July 20, 2020) (“Lull P’); (2) Lull v. County of Sacramento, No. 20-cv-00165 (E.D. Cal. filed Jan. 22, 2020) (“Lull IP’); (3) Lull v. County of Sacramento, No. 20-cv-1645 (E.D. Cal. filed Aug. 17, 2020) (“Lull IP’); and (4) Lull v. County of Sacramento, No. 20-cv-1646 (E.D. Cal. filed Aug. 17, 2020) (“Lull IV”). Defendants County of Sacramento and its individual officers, Lori Moss, Leighann Moffitt, Brian Washko, Robin Rasmussen, Bob Ivie, Scott Purvis, Wayne Eastman, June Powells-Mays, Tammy Derby, Paul 26 …