Doe
(PC) Heim v. Doe
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20211:20-cv-00391California2,185 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER HEIM, 1:20-cv-00391-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE
vs. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
JANE DOE, et al., (ECF No. 22.)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
19 I. BACKGROUND Christopher Heim (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on March 11, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On May 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 13.) On January 4, 2021, Plaintiff lodged a Second Amended Complaint which was filed by the court on January 4, 2021. (ECF Nos. 16, 20.) On March 30, 2021, the court dismissed the Second Amended Complaint, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 21.) On May 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed…