Doe

(PC) Heim v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20211:20-cv-00391California2,185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER HEIM, 1:20-cv-00391-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

vs. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

JANE DOE, et al., (ECF No. 22.)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

19 I. BACKGROUND Christopher Heim (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on March 11, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On May 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 13.) On January 4, 2021, Plaintiff lodged a Second Amended Complaint which was filed by the court on January 4, 2021. (ECF Nos. 16, 20.) On March 30, 2021, the court dismissed the Second Amended Complaint, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 21.) On May 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.