Atayde

Atayde v. Napa State Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20211:16-cv-00398California365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUCY ATAYDE, Case No. 1:16-cv-00398-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE CALIFORNIA

v. FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC., AND

COUNTY OF MERCED, AS DEFENDANTS

NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al., IN THIS ACTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 234)

16 On October 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulated notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) of Defendants California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., and County of Merced. (ECF No. 234.) The dismissal of these Defendants is with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (Id.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. (Id.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.