Sanders

Sanders v. Mims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20211:20-cv-00634California533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP SANDERS, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00634-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO COUNSEL,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

MARGARET MIMS, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 16) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Phillip Sanders is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for appointment of pro bono counsel (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel to allow him the “opportunity to communicate with the court and the defendants [to] address the seriousness of the matter while fast tracking any remedies or changes in policy that should be immediately imposed[.]” (ECF No. 16 at 2.) Plaintiff further contends “the pro bono program would be a perfect opportunity to resolve or remedy this situation so that no one should have to suffer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.