(PC) Hudkins v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20211:21-cv-01473California1,772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY D. HUDKINS and 1:21-cv-01473-GSA-PC

WILLIAM H. BRANDSTATT, ORDER SEVERING PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS

AND DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO

Plaintiffs, OPEN NEW CASE FOR PLAINTIFF

WILLIAM H. BRANDSTATT

vs.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS

K. CLARK, et al., TIMOTHY D. HUDKINS AND WILLIAM H.

BRANDSTATT TO EACH FILE AN

Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT IN HIS OWN CASE

NOT EXCEEDING 25 PAGES TOTAL

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF

WILLIAM H. BRANDSTATT TO SUBMIT

AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS, OR PAY THE $402.

FILING FEE, IN HIS OWN CASE

ORDER FOR CLERK TO REFLECT ON THE

COURT’S DOCKET THAT PLAINTIFF

WILLIAM H. BRANDSTATT HAS BEEN

TERMINATED FROM THIS CASE

23 24 25 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, Timothy D. Hudkins and William H. Brandstatt (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), are state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.