Baccera

(PC) Pradia, Jr. v. Baccera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20211:20-cv-01348California297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL LAPRA PRADIA, JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-01348-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT

A. BECERRA, et al., (Doc. 16) Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion for a default judgment. (Doc. 16.) Plaintiff’s motion is premature. The Court directed service of process on Defendants on August 24, 2021, (Doc. 13); however, Defendants have not yet been served. On November 1, 2021, CDCR filed a notice of intent to waive service on Defendants’ behalf. (Doc. 18.) Pursuant to the Court’s order directing service, Defendants have 60 days from November 1 to file an answer to the complaint. (See Doc. 13 at 2.) Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment be DENIED as premature. These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.